US Graduate Program Ranks
Edyssy’s rank pages put several league tables in one row so you could stop flipping between tabs. This is the engineering table as it stood in 2014: the order on the left, then each school’s position in the Shanghai (ARWU) world ranking (the 2013 edition, current when the table was built), the US News national universities list, and ARWU’s broad subject fields.
| Eng. | University | ARWU | US News | ARWU US | Science | Engineering | Life | Medical | Economics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 4 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 47 | 3 |
| 2 | Stanford University | 2 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 4 |
| 3 | University of California Berkeley | 3 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 30 | 5 |
| 4 | California Institute of Technology | 6 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 20 | 29 | 6 | 46 |
| 5 | Carnegie Mellon University | 52 | 23 | 52 | 76 | 8 | 52 | 52 | 14 |
| 6 | Georgia Institute of Technology | 101+ | 36 | 101+ | 51 | 9 | 101+ | 101+ | 76 |
| 7 | University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign | 25 | 41 | 25 | 29 | 5 | 17 | 25 | 39 |
| 8 | Purdue University West Lafayette | 57 | 68 | 57 | 46 | 10 | 101+ | 57 | 51 |
| 9 | University of Michigan Ann Arbor | 23 | 28 | 23 | 24 | 7 | 28 | 12 | 16 |
| 10 | University of Southern California | 47 | 23 | 47 | 51 | 18 | 51 | 50 | 37 |
| 11 | Texas A&M University | 101+ | 69 | 101+ | 41 | 22 | 101+ | 101+ | 41 |
| 12 | University of Texas at Austin | 36 | 52 | 36 | 33 | 4 | 101+ | 101+ | 23 |
| 13 | Cornell University | 13 | 16 | 13 | 15 | 21 | 16 | 38 | 26 |
| 14 | University of California San Diego | 14 | 39 | 14 | 21 | 13 | 7 | 21 | 19 |
| 15 | Columbia University | 8 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 45 | 9 | 5 | 6 |
| 16 | University of California Los Angeles | 12 | 23 | 12 | 10 | 32 | 24 | 7 | 12 |
| 17 | Princeton University | 7 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 23 | 46 | 7 | 7 |
| 18 | University of Wisconsin Madison | 19 | 41 | 19 | 20 | 29 | 13 | 27 | 29 |
| 19 | University of Maryland College Park | 38 | 62 | 38 | 24 | 16 | 101+ | 38 | 24 |
| 20 | Northwestern University | 30 | 12 | 30 | 30 | 17 | 51 | 41 | 10 |
| 21 | University of California Santa Barbara | 35 | 41 | 35 | 19 | 6 | 51 | 35 | 51 |
| 22 | University of Pennsylvania | 15 | 7 | 15 | 27 | 38 | 21 | 24 | 8 |
| 23 | Harvard University | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 39 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 24 | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | 151+ | 128 | 151+ | 151+ | 33 | 151+ | 151+ | 101+ |
| 25 | Johns Hopkins University | 17 | 12 | 17 | 23 | 101+ | 12 | 4 | 45 |
2014 snapshot as published by Edyssy. Values marked 101+ or 151+ fell into ARWU’s unnumbered bands. In the source, the ARWU US column repeats the world figure for every school. Rankings have moved since; check current editions before quoting a number.
How to read a row
Take Georgia Tech: sixth in engineering, ninth in ARWU’s engineering field, but outside the top 100 on the world list. That is not a contradiction. World rankings reward Nobel laureates, medical schools and sheer research volume across every field; a school built around engineering will always look smaller there than it is in its own discipline. When the columns disagree, trust the one closest to the work you plan to do.
Medical columns show the opposite effect. A school can rank low for medicine simply because it has no medical school, which says nothing about its bioengineering lab.
Program rank versus advisor fit
For a PhD or research master’s, the department’s rank matters less than the lab you join. A well-funded professor at the 30th-ranked program who publishes steadily and places students in good jobs is a better bet than a distracted big name at the 3rd. The program rank describes the average; your experience is one data point drawn from one lab.
Where rank does matter: course quality and breadth, the size of the faculty pool if your first advisor match fails, campus recruiting, and the name on your CV when you apply outside academia. Weigh those, then go back to the people. The grant search tells you who is funded; the help desk tells you what they want from you.
Other fields on the old page
The 2014 page also had tabs for Business, The Sciences, Law, Medicine, Education, Library & Information Studies, Social Sciences & Humanities, Health, Public Affairs, Fine Arts, each with its own sub-specialties down to supply chain and nonprofit management. Only the engineering view was preserved in a readable form, so that is what you see here. For other disciplines, the current US News graduate rankings and ARWU’s subject rankings are the closest equivalents, and the National Research Council’s doctoral program assessments (old, but data-rich) are still cited by faculty.
If you are choosing between two admits rather than building a list, read the Purdue vs USC worked example, which shows how little the rank gap usually decides. Undergraduate lists live on the college ranks page.
Questions about this table
- Why does Georgia Tech rank sixth in engineering but outside the top 100 in the world column?
- World rankings like ARWU count prizes, highly cited researchers and publication volume across all fields, which favours big comprehensive universities with medical schools. A school concentrated in engineering looks far stronger in its own subject column than in the overall list.
- Are these rankings current?
- No. They are the figures Edyssy displayed in 2014, and the ARWU columns match the 2013 edition. Use them to see how the table worked, then check current editions before quoting any position.
- Should I pick a PhD program by its rank?
- Use rank as a filter, not a decision. For research degrees, the advisor’s funding, publication record and how former students fared predict your experience far better than a department’s average position.
- What do 101+ and 151+ mean in the table?
- ARWU publishes exact positions only near the top and groups the rest into bands. A school shown as 101+ was somewhere in the band below 100, not exactly 101st.